πŸ₯Š How Netflix Could Have Prevented the Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul Fight Crash

August 17, 2025
12 min read
load-testingperformance-testingstress-testinginfrastructurenetflixstreaminglocustgradualk6jmeterartillerydevopsscalability

Learn how proper load testing could have prevented Netflix's streaming crash during the biggest boxing event of the year. Discover the tools and strategies to keep your infrastructure standing like a champion!

"In the ring of infrastructure, the knockout punch isn't always visible until it's too late!" πŸ₯ŠπŸ’₯

Recently, Netflix live streamed the highly anticipated fight between Jake Paul vs Mike Tyson where users faced several issues such as poor video quality, pixelation, stuttering, and even outright crashes leading up to and during the main event.

Talk about a technical TKO (Technical Knock Out)! πŸ₯Š

Every day, many websites face the consequences of unusual load on their infrastructure, resulting in losses of users/customers. It's like trying to serve a stadium full of hungry fans with just one food truck! πŸššπŸ”

This is a bigger problem than you might think. Even the giants like Amazon/Flipkart face these issues, mostly during big sale events such as Black Friday Sale, Big Billion Day Sale, etc.

On these big days for your business, the last thing you want is for your website to crash faster than a boxer's hopes after a devastating punch! πŸ’₯


πŸ›‘οΈ How Can You Prevent the Crashes on Your Website?

While there are several ways to prevent crashes (and keep your infrastructure standing like a champion), here are the main contenders:

  1. Proper Load Balancing βš–οΈ
  2. Implement Rate Limiting 🚦
  3. Enable Auto Scaling based on busy ratio, queue length, and static periodic scaling cycles πŸ“ˆ

I'll talk about these techniques in my next post. Surely, these techniques will help you make your infrastructure scalable. But even with these things in place, how will you know if your infrastructure can handle the expected load?

For that, it's important to perform different types of load tests to make sure you're aware of your system's primary and secondary bottlenecks. This will allow you to make informed decisions when your infrastructure is under the weather (and trust me, it's not just a light drizzle! 🌧️).


πŸ§ͺ What is Load Testing?

Load testing is a type of performance testing that simulates real-world load on your application to evaluate how it behaves under expected and peak user traffic. It helps you understand your system's performance characteristics, identify bottlenecks, and ensure your infrastructure can handle the anticipated load before it goes live.

Think of load testing as a dress rehearsal for your system - you want to know how it performs under pressure before the actual event, not during it. Because when the curtain goes up, there's no time for a second take! 🎭

🎯 Key Aspects of Load Testing:

  • 🎭 Simulates realistic user behavior: Creates virtual users that mimic real user actions like logging in, browsing, making purchases, etc.
  • πŸ“Š Measures performance metrics: Tracks response times, throughput, error rates, and resource utilization
  • πŸ’₯ Identifies breaking points: Helps determine the maximum load your system can handle before performance degrades
  • πŸ“ˆ Validates scalability: Ensures your auto-scaling and load balancing configurations work as expected

🚨 Why is Load Testing Crucial?

  1. πŸ’° Prevents revenue loss: Avoid losing customers due to poor performance during peak traffic
  2. 😊 Maintains user experience: Ensure consistent performance even under high load
  3. ⏰ Reduces downtime: Identify and fix issues before they impact real users
  4. πŸ’Έ Optimizes infrastructure costs: Right-size your resources based on actual performance data
  5. 🎯 Builds confidence: Deploy with confidence knowing your system can handle the expected load

For Netflix's live streaming event, comprehensive load testing could have revealed issues with their content delivery network (CDN), streaming servers, and user authentication systems before millions of viewers tuned in. It's like checking your parachute before jumping out of a plane! πŸͺ‚


🎭 What Are Different Types of Load Testing?

Understanding different types of load testing is crucial for creating a comprehensive testing strategy. Each type serves a specific purpose and helps uncover different aspects of your system's performance characteristics. Think of them as different training methods for your infrastructure! πŸ’ͺ

🎯 1. Load Testing (Baseline)

This is the most common type where you test your application under expected normal load conditions.

Purpose: Validate that your system can handle the anticipated number of concurrent users during normal operations.

Example: If your e-commerce site typically has 1,000 concurrent users during regular business hours, you'd simulate exactly that load to ensure smooth performance.

Key Metrics: Response time, throughput, and resource utilization under normal conditions.

πŸ’ͺ 2. Stress Testing

Stress testing pushes your system beyond its normal operating capacity to identify the breaking point.

Purpose: Determine the maximum load your system can handle before it starts to fail or degrade significantly.

Example: Gradually increasing load from 1,000 to 10,000+ concurrent users to find where your system starts throwing errors or becomes unresponsive.

Key Benefits:

  • 🎯 Identifies system limits
  • 🎭 Reveals how gracefully your system fails
  • πŸ“ˆ Helps plan capacity for unexpected traffic spikes

⚑ 3. Spike Testing

This type simulates sudden, dramatic increases in load over a short period.

Purpose: Test how your system handles sudden traffic surges, similar to what Netflix experienced during the fight.

Example: Simulating a scenario where your user base jumps from 1,000 to 50,000 users within minutes (like when a viral social media post drives traffic to your site).

Why it matters: Many systems can handle gradual load increases but fail when hit with sudden spikes because auto-scaling takes time to kick in. It's like trying to put out a forest fire with a garden hose! πŸ”₯🚿

πŸ“Š 4. Volume Testing

Volume testing focuses on testing your system with large amounts of data rather than concurrent users.

Purpose: Ensure your database and data processing capabilities can handle large datasets without performance degradation.

Example: Testing how your system performs when processing millions of records or handling large file uploads.

Key Areas: Database performance, file processing, data migration scenarios.

⏰ 5. Endurance Testing (Soak Testing)

This involves running your system under normal load for extended periods.

Purpose: Identify issues that only surface over time, such as memory leaks, resource exhaustion, or performance degradation.

Example: Running your system with 1,000 concurrent users for 24-48 hours continuously to ensure stability.

Common Issues Found: Memory leaks, connection pool exhaustion, disk space issues, cache degradation.

πŸ“ˆ 6. Scalability Testing

Tests your system's ability to scale up or down based on load changes.

Purpose: Validate that your auto-scaling configurations work correctly and efficiently.

Example: Testing if your Kubernetes cluster properly scales from 2 to 20 pods when load increases, and scales back down when load decreases.

Key Validations:

  • Auto-scaling triggers work correctly
  • New instances come online quickly
  • Load is properly distributed across scaled resources

🎯 Which Type Should You Prioritize?

For most applications, I recommend this testing sequence:

  1. Start with Load Testing: Establish your baseline performance 🎯
  2. Add Stress Testing: Find your breaking points πŸ’₯
  3. Include Spike Testing: Prepare for viral moments ⚑
  4. Run Endurance Testing: Ensure long-term stability ⏰

For Netflix's streaming event, spike testing would have been particularly crucial since they knew exactly when millions of users would simultaneously start streaming. It's like knowing exactly when the bell rings for round one! πŸ””


πŸ› οΈ Popular Stress Testing Tools and When to Use Them

Choosing the right stress testing tool is crucial for getting accurate insights into your infrastructure's performance. Different tools excel at different scenarios, and selecting the wrong one can lead to misleading results or missed bottlenecks. It's like choosing between a scalpel and a sledgehammer - both are tools, but they serve very different purposes! πŸ”¨βš‘

🐍 1. Locust - The Python-Based Powerhouse

Best for: Applications with fast response times (sub-second to few seconds)

Key Features:

  • 🐍 Python-based scripting for complex user behavior simulation
  • 🌐 Real-time web interface for monitoring tests
  • πŸš€ Distributed testing across multiple machines
  • ✍️ Easy to write custom user scenarios

When to use Locust:

  • Your infrastructure serves requests within seconds
  • You want to test requests per second (RPS) capacity
  • You need to simulate complex user workflows
  • You prefer Python for test scripting

Example Use Case: Testing an e-commerce site where users typically experience 2-3 second response times. Locust can help you determine how many requests per second your infrastructure can handle before response times degrade.

Limitation: For applications with very slow response times (8-10+ seconds), RPS-based testing might not give you the complete picture of concurrent user capacity.

🐌 2. Gradual - Concurrent User Focus

Best for: Applications with slower response times or when you need to understand concurrent user capacity

Key Features:

  • πŸ‘₯ Focuses on concurrent users rather than requests per second
  • ⏳ Better suited for long-running operations
  • 🎭 More realistic for applications with varying response times
  • πŸ” Helps identify true concurrent user bottlenecks

When to use Gradual:

  • Your infrastructure takes 8-10+ seconds to serve requests
  • You want to understand how many users your system can serve simultaneously
  • RPS-based testing doesn't reflect real user experience
  • You're testing applications with long-running operations (file processing, complex calculations, etc.)

Example Use Case: Testing a video processing service where each request takes 8-10 seconds. Gradual would help you determine if your system can handle 100 concurrent users, even if that means only 10-12 requests complete per second.

Why it's different: Instead of bombarding your system with requests per second, Gradual maintains a steady number of concurrent users, which is often more realistic for applications with variable response times. It's like having a steady stream of customers instead of a stampede! πŸšΆβ€β™‚οΈπŸšΆβ€β™€οΈ

πŸš€ 3. K6 - The Modern Alternative

Best for: Teams looking for a modern, JavaScript-based solution with cloud integration

Key Features:

  • ⚑ JavaScript-based scripting (ES6+)
  • ☁️ Built-in cloud execution capabilities
  • πŸ”— Excellent integration with CI/CD pipelines
  • 🧩 Rich ecosystem of extensions and integrations
  • 🎯 Supports both RPS and concurrent user testing

When to use K6:

  • Your team prefers JavaScript over Python
  • You need seamless CI/CD integration
  • You want cloud-based test execution
  • You need to test both RPS and concurrent user scenarios
  • You're building a modern testing pipeline

Example Use Case: A development team using JavaScript/Node.js who wants to integrate performance testing into their automated deployment pipeline. K6 can run tests automatically before each deployment to ensure performance hasn't regressed.

🏒 4. Apache JMeter - The Enterprise Standard

Best for: Enterprise environments requiring extensive protocol support and detailed reporting

Key Features:

  • 🌐 Supports multiple protocols (HTTP, JDBC, LDAP, etc.)
  • πŸ“Š Comprehensive reporting and analysis
  • πŸ”Œ Extensive plugin ecosystem
  • πŸ—οΈ Good for complex enterprise applications

When to use JMeter:

  • You need to test multiple protocols beyond HTTP
  • You require detailed, enterprise-grade reporting
  • Your team is already familiar with Java-based tools
  • You need extensive plugin support

🎯 5. Artillery - The Node.js Native

Best for: Node.js teams who want a simple, YAML-based configuration

Key Features:

  • πŸ“ YAML-based configuration (no coding required)
  • πŸ”Œ Built-in support for WebSocket testing
  • 🎯 Good for simple load testing scenarios
  • πŸš€ Easy to integrate with Node.js projects

When to use Artillery:

  • You want simple, declarative test configuration
  • You're testing WebSocket-based applications
  • Your team prefers YAML over code
  • You need quick, simple load tests

🎯 How to Choose the Right Tool

πŸ“Š Decision Matrix

Tool Best For Learning Curve Protocol Support CI/CD Integration
🐍 Locust Fast response times, Python teams Medium HTTP/HTTPS Good
🐌 Gradual Slow response times, concurrent users Low HTTP/HTTPS Basic
πŸš€ K6 Modern teams, JavaScript preference Medium HTTP/HTTPS, WebSocket Excellent
🏒 JMeter Enterprise, multiple protocols High Extensive Good
🎯 Artillery Simple scenarios, Node.js teams Low HTTP/HTTPS, WebSocket Good

πŸš€ Quick Selection Guide

  1. Choose 🐍 Locust if:

    • Your app responds in seconds
    • You want to test RPS capacity
    • Your team knows Python
  2. Choose 🐌 Gradual if:

    • Your app takes 8+ seconds to respond
    • You want to test concurrent user capacity
    • RPS testing doesn't make sense for your use case
  3. Choose πŸš€ K6 if:

    • You want modern tooling
    • JavaScript is your preferred language
    • You need excellent CI/CD integration
  4. Choose 🏒 JMeter if:

    • You need enterprise-grade features
    • You're testing multiple protocols
    • You have Java expertise
  5. Choose 🎯 Artillery if:

    • You want simple YAML configuration
    • You're testing WebSockets
    • You prefer minimal coding

🎬 For Netflix's Use Case

Given that Netflix was streaming live video (which inherently has longer response times due to buffering and processing), 🐌 Gradual would have been particularly valuable for testing their concurrent user capacity. They could have determined how many simultaneous viewers their infrastructure could support, rather than just how many requests per second it could handle.

However, a comprehensive testing strategy would likely involve multiple tools:

  • 🐍 Locust for testing their authentication and user management systems
  • 🐌 Gradual for testing streaming capacity
  • πŸš€ K6 for testing their CDN and edge servers
  • 🏒 JMeter for testing their payment and subscription systems

The key is matching the tool to the specific aspect of your infrastructure you're testing, rather than trying to use one tool for everything. It's like having a toolbox where each tool has its specific purpose - you wouldn't use a hammer to tighten a screw! πŸ”¨πŸ”§


🎯 Final Round: Key Takeaways

  1. πŸ₯Š Load testing is your infrastructure's training camp - prepare it for the big fight!
  2. 🎭 Different testing types reveal different weaknesses - don't just do one type
  3. πŸ› οΈ Choose your tools wisely - match the tool to the testing scenario
  4. πŸ“Š Test early, test often - don't wait until the main event to discover issues
  5. πŸš€ Prevention is better than cure - especially when millions of users are watching!

Remember, in the world of infrastructure, the best defense is a good offense. Load test your systems before they're under pressure, and you'll be the champion of reliability! πŸ†

"May your infrastructure be as resilient as Mike Tyson's chin, and your load testing as thorough as a boxing referee's count!" πŸ₯ŠπŸ””